Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam 300 g white and blue tube
Supporting role for Excess Oiliness
What makes this different

It is a proper saponified soap, four fatty acids and potassium hydroxide, in an era when almost every other Korean cleanser has moved to low-pH syndets, and it puts glycerin first to soften the blow. The baking-powder concept is mostly branding, but the cellulose polish and the whipped lather give it a distinct, old-fashioned satisfaction that its many fans are buying on purpose.

Etude

Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam Review

K-Beauty Soap Foam Classic Cleansers foam k beauty Paraben free Vegan Not cruelty free

A dense, whipped, sweetly scented soap foam with a cellulose polish and a pinch of baking soda for the name, sold in a tube big enough to last half a year for about twelve dollars. It cleans oily skin brilliantly and leaves everyone else tight and squeaky, because underneath the kitchen-cupboard branding it is an alkaline soap in a decade that has moved on to low-pH cleansers.

Price $12.00 300 g (10.58 oz) · more sizes
Shopper rating 4.4 ★★★★★ 6,000 reviews
Best for oily
Buy at Amazon ♥
Verdicts

How well it fits each concern

One verdict per concern. Open a row for the reasoning; the receipt has every source.

The scaleRecommendedGoodSupportingEarly evidenceNot for thisAvoidhow it works

Supporting rolefor Excess OilinessNothing here targets excess oiliness directly; sebum removal without stripping is the recognised companion to treating it, and this foam does that without known triggers.ReceiptGlycerin: no evidence row for this concern yet · rule R8, same reading on 3,793 products · open the receipt

The case for it

  1. Glycerin has no evidence row yet for this concern — it is in the research queue.
  2. The formula carries no trigger this concern is sensitive to, with the cautions noted.

Not from a trial rowStandard tolerabilityNo reviews read yet

Cautions: fungal-acne triggers.

What would change this: A researched evidence row for the lead active would replace this with a verdict.

Same rule for everyone. “Supporting role” is the verdict on 7,796 of 45,446 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R8 decided 3,793 of them. Unchanged since September 25, 2026, engine 5.2.0.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

The full receipt: rule, row, sources, dates →All excess oiliness products →

Supporting rolefor BlackheadsNothing here targets blackheads directly; gentle cleansing is the recognised companion to treating it, and this foam does that without known triggers.ReceiptGlycerin: no evidence row for this concern yet · rule R8, same reading on 3,793 products · open the receipt

The case for it

  1. Glycerin has no evidence row yet for this concern — it is in the research queue.
  2. The formula carries no trigger this concern is sensitive to, with the cautions noted.

Not from a trial rowStandard tolerabilityNo reviews read yet

Cautions: fungal-acne triggers.

What would change this: A researched evidence row for the lead active would replace this with a verdict.

Same rule for everyone. “Supporting role” is the verdict on 7,796 of 45,446 concern verdicts across the catalog; rule R8 decided 3,793 of them. Unchanged since September 25, 2026, engine 5.2.0.

Brand or formulator? Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

The full receipt: rule, row, sources, dates →All blackheads products →How blackheads is treated →

Also listed for Rough Texture — the actives here (Glycerin, Silica, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Minerals & Salts) are in our research queue for that concern; there is no verdict until their evidence rows are written. That is a gap in our table, not a mark against the product.

Does the jobDoes what a cleanser is for: puts something back, surfactant mildness. Not measured from the label: pH match to skin.

A verdict is Dermington’s assessment of how well a product’s ingredients fit a concern — never a claim about what the product treats. Evidence dots and collected reviews sit beside it and are never blended in. Rules 0.5.1 · evidence table ev-2026.10-r231 · engine 5.2.0 · how we decide · this product’s receipt

Reader poll · Town SquareQuestion 1 of up to 3

Have you used Baking Powder Pore Foam?

One tap counts. A couple of optional follow-ups come next.

No account neededOne answer each, change it any timeCounted only in anonymous totalsHow the Square counts →
Assessment

Pros & cons

What it does well 7

  • Dense, creamy, whipped lather that cleans oily skin thoroughly in one pass
  • Cellulose and silica give a soft polish that rinses away completely
  • Glycerin listed first softens the after-feel more than most soap foams
  • Removes light makeup and most sunscreens without a first cleanse
  • A 300 g tube lasts four to six months for around twelve dollars
  • No alcohol, silicone, oil or sulfate detergents
  • A decade-plus of consistent sales and a large, mostly positive review base

Where it falls short 5

  • Alkaline soap base leaves skin tight and squeaky, especially dry or sensitive skin
  • Added fragrance with a lingering sweet scent
  • Baking soda is a trace ingredient; the concept is branding
  • Fatty acids in the soap base can bother acne-prone and fungal-acne-prone skin
  • Flip cap clogs with dried paste and the tube is bulky
Review

The full review

Baking powder is on the front of the tube in letters larger than the brand name. On the back, sodium bicarbonate is the eighteenth ingredient of twenty-one, sandwiched between sodium chloride and disodium EDTA at the level where preservatives live. The washing is done by something else entirely, and that something is the oldest cleanser chemistry there is: stearic, myristic, palmitic and lauric acids in positions three to nine, saponified by potassium hydroxide in sixth place. Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam is soap. Very good soap, wrapped in a Pinterest-era concept, and understanding that explains both the fan base and the tightness.

The product dates from the Etude House years, from the same budget pore-care wave that gave the brand its Wonder Pore astringent, and it has been repackaged, enlarged from 160 mL to a 300 g tube and shortened to 'Pore Foam' after the 2021 rename without any real change of character. It survived because it does something a lot of people still want. Squeeze a pea of the thick, faintly gritty paste into wet palms, and it whips into the kind of dense, marshmallow foam that Korean cleansers made famous, the sort you can turn upside down without losing. Massage it over the face and the microcrystalline cellulose and silica give a soft polish; rinse, and the skin is spotless, smooth and matte in a way syndet cleansers rarely manage.

Then it squeaks. Soap removes surface lipids and pushes the skin's naturally acidic surface toward alkaline, and the tight, squeaky after-feel is the sensation of both happening at once. Etude knew this, which is why glycerin sits first on the list, ahead of water, an unusually heavy humectant load that keeps the paste soft in the tube and takes some of the edge off. Cocamidopropyl betaine in tenth place is a modern amphoteric borrowed from gentler cleansers to stabilise the lather and reduce irritancy. The counterweights help. They do not change the base. It is worth pausing on why the base is still soap at all. Korean cleanser design spent the last decade converting almost wholesale to low-pH syndets, driven by a consumer literacy about the acid mantle that would embarrass most Western drugstores, and Etude's own SoonJung line was an early standard-bearer for that shift. Keeping a saponified foam in the catalogue is therefore not ignorance; it is a decision to serve the customers who never wanted the new thing. A dense, hot-lather soap that leaves oily skin feeling scrubbed is a sensation some people will not give up, and this tube is priced and sized for them.

Whether that matters depends entirely on whose face it is. Oily, resilient skin, particularly in a hot climate or a heavy-sunscreen routine, tends to adore this cleanser, because the thorough degreasing is the point and the skin's own oil restores comfort within the hour. Normal skin can use it as a two-or-three-nights-a-week deep cleanse and be happy. Dry, sensitive, rosacea-prone or barrier-compromised skin will find it stripping from the first wash, and the sweet powdery fragrance, listed mid-formula, adds a second reason for reactive faces to look elsewhere.

The baking powder deserves one more word, because the concept has drifted into skincare folklore. Baking soda on skin is alkaline and mildly abrasive; DIY baking-soda scrubs are a reliable way to irritate a face. Here the quantity is trivial and it dissolves in the lather, so the concern is not the bicarbonate but the soap it rides on. The real physical exfoliation is the cellulose, which is plant-derived, rounded and rinses away, a far kinder choice than the crushed shells and plastic beads of older scrubs.

What the tube offers, then, is a specific, slightly retro pleasure: a proper foaming soap with a gentle polish, a comforting smell and a size that makes it feel free. Used as the second step of an evening double cleanse, followed by a low-pH toner and a moisturizer, and kept to a few nights a week on anything but oily skin, it is a satisfying deep-clean at a price that barely registers. Used every morning and night as a daily cleanser by someone with normal or dry skin, it is a slow way to a tight, flaky face. Etude sells the gentle alternative in its own SoonJung range; this one is for people who know they want soap.

One practical note on technique, because it decides how the product is experienced. Built in the palms with plenty of water, the lather is cushiony and the cellulose barely registers; rubbed straight from the tube onto a wet face, it is a paste with grit and a soap that has not yet diluted, and that is where most of the 'harsh' reviews come from. The same tube, the same skin, two different products depending on thirty seconds in the hands.

The science

The formula is a classic potassium soap: stearic, myristic, palmitic and lauric acids neutralised in the tube by potassium hydroxide, with cocamidopropyl betaine as a lather stabiliser. Soap-based cleansers sit at pH 9 to 10, well above the skin's natural surface pH of around 4.5 to 5.5, and the consequences are documented. Korting's 1995 review in Dermatology set out the acid-mantle concept and showed that alkaline soaps raise skin surface pH for hours after washing, disturbing the barrier enzymes and resident flora that depend on acidity (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8573921/). A 2002 study in the International Journal of Dermatology by Baranda and colleagues measured the pH and irritant potential of cleansers marketed for dry skin and found that the alkaline, soap-based products were the more irritating, with a clear correlation between pH and irritation (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12207765/). This cleanser's glycerin-first formulation and amphoteric co-surfactant are recognised ways of reducing, though not removing, that effect.

Sodium bicarbonate, the headline ingredient, is present at a trace level, dissolves in the lather and contributes little beyond a small additional alkalinity; there is no published evidence that baking soda in a rinse-off cleanser clears pores. The physical exfoliation is delivered by microcrystalline cellulose and silica, which are rounded, biodegradable and rinse away, a gentler choice than the irregular natural-shell abrasives that have been shown to create micro-tears. Lactic acid at the very end of the list is a pH adjuster, not an exfoliant at that level.

No trial of this product has been published, and its pH is not disclosed by Etude. Its performance can be predicted from the soap literature: excellent sebum removal and a temporary rise in surface pH that most oily skin tolerates and most dry or sensitive skin does not.

References 2 ShowHide
  1. The concept of the acid mantle of the skin: its relevance for the choice of skin cleansers — Dermatology (1995)
  2. Correlation between pH and irritant effect of cleansers marketed for dry skin — International Journal of Dermatology (2002)

The clinical view

The clinical consensus on facial cleansing has moved decisively toward synthetic-detergent and low-pH formulations, with true soaps reserved, if at all, for very oily skin and body use. A dermatologist looking at this ingredient list would recognise a potassium fatty-acid soap with a cellulose scrub and fragrance, and would generally steer patients with acne under treatment, rosacea, eczema, seborrhoeic dermatitis or any barrier compromise toward a gentle, fragrance-free, pH-balanced cleanser instead, since alkaline washing and physical exfoliation both aggravate those conditions and blunt the tolerability of retinoids and benzoyl peroxide. For patients with robust oily skin who prefer the feel of a foaming soap, the usual advice is evening use only, a light hand with the massage, and a moisturizer afterwards, with any tightness that persists into the next morning taken as a sign to switch. The baking-soda framing is not viewed as a clinical benefit.

Formula

Key ingredients

  1. Stearic, Myristic, Palmitic and Lauric Acids + Potassium Hydroxide

    Four fatty acids in positions three to nine with potassium hydroxide in sixth place: that is a true soap, saponified in the tube. It is the source of the dense, whipped, cream-like lather Korean foam cleansers are famous for, and also of the alkaline pH and the squeaky after-feel that define this product.

    Not yet assessed
  2. Sodium Bicarbonate

    The baking soda on the front of the tube, eighteenth on the list. Marketing casts it as the pore-clearing hero; in practice it is a mild alkaline buffer and a trace of fine grit that dissolves in water, and its contribution to cleansing is far smaller than the soap base above it.

    Not yet assessed
  3. Microcrystalline Cellulose + Silica

    The actual scrub particles: plant-derived cellulose in eighth place and silica further down give the foam its 'fine powder' texture that polishes the surface as you massage. They are softer than nut shells or plastic beads and rinse away completely.

    Not yet assessed
  4. Glycerin

    Listed first, ahead of water, which is unusual for a foaming cleanser and is Etude's counterweight to the soap: a heavy humectant load that keeps the paste soft in the tube and takes some of the edge off the alkaline rinse.

    Not yet assessed
  5. Cocamidopropyl Betaine

    The amphoteric co-surfactant in tenth place that stabilises the soap lather and reduces its irritancy a little. It is the one ingredient here borrowed from modern syndet cleansers, and it does not change the fact that the base is soap.

    Not yet assessed
Full ingredient list 21 ingredients ShowHide

Glycerin, Water/Aqua/Eau, Stearic Acid, Myristic Acid, PEG-32, Potassium Hydroxide, Palmitic Acid, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Lauric Acid, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Fragrance/Parfum, Silica, PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate, Polyquaternium-7, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Bicarbonate, Disodium EDTA, Sodium Benzoate, Lactic Acid

Safety & formulation facts

  • Pregnancy safe
  • Not fragrance free
  • Alcohol free
  • Oil free
  • Silicone free
  • Paraben free
  • Sulfate free
  • Not cruelty free
  • Vegan
  • Not fungal-acne safe
Pore-clogging (comedogenic) Myristic AcidLauric AcidStearic Acid
Potential irritants Fragrance/ParfumPotassium Hydroxide (alkaline soap base)Cocamidopropyl BetaineSodium Bicarbonate
Common allergens Fragrance/ParfumCocamidopropyl Betaine
Compatibility

Skin types & routine

Routine step cleanser
Time of day Night
Best season summer
Finish matte

Layering

Best as the evening second cleanse after an oil or balm, whipped into foam in the palms before it touches the face; follow immediately with a low-pH toner or hydrating essence to bring the skin back to acid. Two or three nights a week is enough for most faces.

When to expect results

Immediate: a very clean, smooth, matte face and a slight squeak. There is nothing cumulative to wait for; over weeks the only trend to watch is whether the alkaline soap starts to leave the skin tight or flaky, which is the signal to cut back.

Pairs well with hyaluronic-acidceramidescentella-asiatica
Don't combine with retinolglycolic-acidsalicylic-acid

A routine built around it

Morning

  1. Splash of water or gentle low-pH cleanser
  2. Moisturizer
  3. Sunscreen SPF 30+

Night

  1. Cleansing oil
  2. Etude Baking Powder Pore Foamthis product
  3. Low-pH hydrating toner
  4. Moisturizer
Guidance

How to use it, and who it's for

How to use

In the evening, after removing sunscreen or makeup with an oil or balm cleanser, squeeze a pea-sized amount into wet palms and rub them together until a thick, dense foam forms; the foam should be built in the hands, not on the face. Massage it over damp skin for about thirty seconds with light circles, letting the cellulose do the polishing without pressure, and avoid the eye area. Rinse thoroughly with lukewarm water until the squeak fades, pat dry and follow straight away with a low-pH toner or essence and a moisturizer to bring the skin back to comfort. Oily skin can use it nightly; normal and combination skin two or three nights a week; dry and sensitive skin should choose a gentler cleanser. Wipe the cap after use so the paste does not clog it.

Is it worth the price?

Twelve dollars for 300 g is remarkable value by volume; a pea-sized amount whips into enough foam for the whole face, so the tube lasts four to six months and the cost per wash is a few cents. Amorepacific's manufacturing scale is what makes a fragranced, cellulose-loaded soap this cheap, and Etude does not pretend the formula is more than it is. The catch is that value only counts for skin that can use it regularly: oily and combination faces get a genuine bargain, while anyone who ends up using it once a week as an occasional deep cleanse will be looking at the same tube two years later. A smaller size exists and is the sensible first purchase for anyone unsure which group they are in.

Who should buy it

Oily and combination skin, especially in humid weather or under heavy sunscreen, that wants a dense, whipped soap foam with a mild polish and is happy to follow it with a hydrating toner. It also suits anyone nostalgic for the squeaky-clean feel of a real foaming soap at a pocket-money price.

Who should skip it

Dry, sensitive, rosacea-prone, eczema-prone and barrier-damaged skin should avoid an alkaline soap with fragrance and grit, and anyone on retinoids, acids or benzoyl peroxide will find it compounds irritation. Fungal-acne-prone skin may react to the fatty-acid base.

Ready to try it?Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam · $12.00 · 300 g (10.58 oz)
Details

The product, in detail

Texture
A thick, off-white paste with a faint grain from the cellulose and silica that whips with water into a dense, marshmallow-like foam; a pea-sized amount produces a surprising volume.
Scent
A sweet, powdery, faintly floral perfume, distinctly present in the lather and lingering lightly after rinsing.
Packaging
A fat 300 g squeeze tube with a flip cap in white and pale blue, replacing the earlier 160 mL tube; the size is the selling point and the flip cap tends to clog with dried paste.
How long it lasts
Four to six months at a pea-sized amount nightly; the 300 g tube is genuinely oversized for one face.
Once opened
Use within 12 months · track your toss-by date →
Size
300 g (10.58 oz) · other sizes available
Made in
South Korea

What the first two weeks feel like

The first wash is a pleasure: the foam is dense and creamy, the massage feels like a gentle polish and the rinse leaves the skin remarkably clean and smooth. Within minutes, dry or normal skin notices the tightness; oily skin does not. There is no adjustment period beyond learning how little you need.

The story behind it

Why it exists

Baking Powder Pore Cleansing Foam appeared in the Etude House years as a budget deep cleanser built around a homely kitchen ingredient, in the same wave that produced the brand's Wonder Pore astringent. It sold strongly enough to be enlarged from 160 mL to a 300 g tube, was shortened to 'Baking Powder Pore Foam' after the 2021 rebrand to Etude, and remains one of the few soap-based foams the brand still makes.

About Etude Established Brand (5–20 years)

Etude is Amorepacific's youth-market brand, trading in Korea since 1985 and renamed from Etude House in 2021. It benefits from the parent group's formulation and manufacturing scale but publishes no clinical work of its own; products like this one are validated by decades of mass sales and Korean safety testing rather than by trials.

Brand founded 1985

Myth vs. reality

What people get wrong about it

MythThe baking powder is what clears the pores.

RealitySodium bicarbonate is eighteenth on the list, a trace ingredient that dissolves in water. The cleansing comes from the soap base of fatty acids and potassium hydroxide in positions three to nine, and the polish from cellulose and silica; the baking powder is mostly the name.

MythA cleanser that leaves skin squeaky clean is doing a better job.

RealityThe squeak is the sound of surface lipids being removed and the skin's acidic surface being pushed alkaline by soap. Modern low-pH cleansers remove dirt and makeup just as well without that after-feel, and the acid mantle takes time to recover after each alkaline wash.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Is the Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam a low-pH cleanser?

No. It is a true soap, built from stearic, myristic, palmitic and lauric acids saponified with potassium hydroxide, with sodium bicarbonate added, so the lather is alkaline. Etude's low-pH cleansers are in its SoonJung line; this one is deliberately old-school.

Can I use Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam every day?

Oily, resilient skin often can, once a day in the evening. Normal, combination and drier skin do better using it two or three times a week as a deep-cleanse and relying on a gentler wash otherwise, because the alkaline soap base leaves skin tight with repeated use.

Does the Baking Powder cleanser exfoliate?

Mildly. Microcrystalline cellulose and silica give the foam a fine polish as you massage, and the sodium bicarbonate dissolves rather than scrubs. It is far gentler than a walnut scrub but is still physical exfoliation, so keep the massage light and skip it on irritated skin.

Does Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam remove makeup and sunscreen?

It removes light makeup and most sunscreens on its own thanks to the strong soap lather. For waterproof sunscreen or long-wear foundation, use a cleansing oil first and this as the second step, which is how most Korean routines use it.

Why does my skin feel tight after using Etude Baking Powder Pore Foam?

The soap base strips surface oil and briefly raises the skin's pH, which reads as tightness and squeak. Following with a low-pH toner and moisturizer restores comfort, and if the tightness persists into the next morning the cleanser is too strong for your skin's current state.

Is the Etude Baking Powder cleanser fragrance-free?

No, it contains added perfume with a sweet powdery scent, listed mid-formula. Fragrance-sensitive users should look to Etude's SoonJung cleansers, which are unscented.

Reviews

What shoppers tend to say

Recurring themes our editors read across retailer reviews — summaries in our words, not quotations, and not a substitute for a patch test.

Common praise

  • Rich, creamy, whipped lather
  • Skin feels deeply clean and smooth
  • Huge tube that lasts for months

Common complaints

  • Tight, squeaky, dry after-feel
  • Fragrance
  • Too harsh for daily use on dry or sensitive skin
Notable endorsementsLong-running Etude best-seller, repeatedly repackaged and now sold in a 300 g tube
Next stepCheck it against what you already useClashes, spacing and the right order, with everything on your shelf.