Receipt

Proya Med Double Usage Lotion Mist

Everything behind the verdicts on this product: the rule that fired for each concern, the three answers and the documents they rest on, every study on the row with the date it was opened, and the versions of the tables that produced them. Nothing here is edited by hand; it is generated from the same records the verdicts are.

The scaleRecommendedGoodSupportingEarly evidenceNot for thisAvoidhow it works

Engine 5.2.0 · rules 0.5.1 · evidence table ev-2026.10-r231 · computed October 13, 2026 · how we decide · the evidence table · the anchors

Good choice

for Sensitivity

No fragrance, drying alcohol, declarable allergens or sensitising preservatives in this mist — the profile sensitive skin looks for.

For sensitivity only: no fragrance, drying alcohol, declarable allergens or sensitising preservatives in the formula.

Rule
F2 → Good choice. The formula carries no trigger and no caution for the concern.
q3 = gentle
Why this rule exists: Gentle = no weighted deduction fired and fit ≥ 90.
Rule F2 decided 1,955 verdicts across the catalog; “Good choice” is the verdict on 1,955 of 45,446. The full register.
Carrying active
Niacinamide + Panthenol + Allantoin
1 · Standing
Not assessed
No evidence row exists for this active and concern; it is in the research queue.
2 · Form
Plausible — concentration not declared; read from the position in the ingredient list
3 · Tolerability
Gentle
Evidence dots
Not from a trial row
What readers report
No reviews read yet for this product. Shown beside the verdict; never blended into it.
Verdict since
September 25, 2026 (unchanged across rebuilds since then)

← Back to the verdict All sensitivity products → Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Supporting role

for Dehydration

Nothing here targets dehydration directly; humectant hydration is the recognised companion to treating it, and this mist does that without known triggers.

Nothing here targets the concern directly, but the product’s job — barrier care, gentle cleansing, photoprotection — is the recognised companion to treating it. Rinse-off products carrying leave-on actives land here too.

Rule
R8 → Supporting role. An active with early or mechanistic evidence only or an active researched for the concern and found wanting or an active with no evidence row for the concern yet; the product’s category job is a recognised companion to treating the concern.
q1 = plausible | none | not-assessed · supportive = true
Why this rule exists: The category's job (barrier care, humectant hydration, gentle cleansing, photoprotection) is the documented supportive role for this concern. This is the honest verdict for a moisturizer on an acne page.
Rule R8 decided 3,793 verdicts across the catalog; “Supporting role” is the verdict on 7,796 of 45,446. The full register.
Carrying active
Niacinamide + Panthenol + Allantoin
1 · Standing
Not assessed
No evidence row exists for this active and concern; it is in the research queue.
2 · Form
Plausible — concentration not declared; read from the position in the ingredient list
3 · Tolerability
Gentle
Evidence dots
Not from a trial row
What readers report
No reviews read yet for this product. Shown beside the verdict; never blended into it.
Verdict since
September 25, 2026 (unchanged across rebuilds since then)

← Back to the verdict All dehydration products → Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Good choice

for Compromised Skin Barrier

Niacinamide is a reference standard by mechanism for compromised skin barrier; this mist carries it high in the ingredient list.

A trial-supported active, or a reference standard by mechanism, at a working level; or a first-line active below its studied range.

Rule
R5 → Good choice. A supported active (trial-backed, or a reference standard by mechanism); declared at a working strength, or a labelled active or at a plausible but undeclared level.
q1 = supported · q2 = adequate | plausible
Why this rule exists: Trial-supported or guideline-supported active, adequately or plausibly dosed.
Rule R5 decided 9,843 verdicts across the catalog; “Good choice” is the verdict on 10,340 of 45,446. The full register.
Carrying active
Niacinamide + Panthenol + Allantoin
1 · Standing
Supported — its mechanism is established (a reference standard, not a trial result)
2 · Form
Adequate — concentration not declared; read from the position in the ingredient list
Studied range: 2%, from the trials on the row; needs leave-on contact; judge it after about 8 weeks
3 · Tolerability
Gentle
Evidence dots
Limited evidence
Row checked against its sources on July 17, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.10-r231).
What readers report
No reviews read yet for this product. Shown beside the verdict; never blended into it.
Verdict since
September 25, 2026 (unchanged across rebuilds since then)

The studies and documents on the row

← Back to the verdict All compromised skin barrier products → Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

Promising

for Post-Procedure

Ceramides has trial-level evidence for post procedure but no guideline or regulatory standing yet — promising, short of a recommendation; the other actives here are not yet assessed for it.

The lead active has at least one trial behind it for the concern but no guideline or regulatory standing yet, and is present at a working level. Short of a recommendation.

Rule
R9p → Promising. An active with early or mechanistic evidence only; declared at a working strength, or a labelled active or at a plausible but undeclared level; the product’s category job is not a recognised companion to the concern; moderate or strong evidence dots on the carrier’s row.
q1 = plausible · q2 = adequate | plausible · supportive = false · strength = moderate | strong
Why this rule exists: 0.5.0: 'Unproven' beside three filled dots read as one question answered twice with opposite words (7,018 rows). The chip measures standing, the dots measure trial volume; where the row carries at least one RCT or a tier-2 source (moderate dots) and the active is present at a working level, the honest word is Promising. Unproven is reserved for plausible-standing rows with limited or weak evidence, or an under-dosed form. Same rank as Unproven — a bet either way; the dots order them.
Rule R9p decided 4,872 verdicts across the catalog; “Promising” is the verdict on 4,872 of 45,446. The full register.
Carrying active
Ceramide EOP + Ceramide NP + Cholesterol
1 · Standing
Plausible — trials support it
2 · Form
Plausible — concentration not declared; read from the position in the ingredient list
3 · Tolerability
Gentle
Evidence dots
Moderate evidence
Row checked against its sources on July 17, 2026 (evidence table ev-2026.10-r231).
What readers report
No reviews read yet for this product. Shown beside the verdict; never blended into it.
Verdict since
September 25, 2026 (unchanged across rebuilds since then)

The studies and documents on the row

← Back to the verdict All post-procedure products → Disclose a concentration or correct a fact →

The category job
Does the job

as a toner

Does what a toner is for: not alcohol-driven, adds something real.

Rule
J2 → Does the job. The category-job reading is 65 or more.
Category job score over the measured features 65–85.
Measured from the label
adds something real, not alcohol-driven
Not measurable from the label
restores skin pH, plays well with what follows
Tolerability
Gentle

A verdict is Dermington’s assessment of how well a product’s ingredients fit a concern — never a claim about what the product treats. Every rule is public and the same for every product; a brand cannot buy a reading. How we decide · what has changed · disclaimer.

Next on the Your first visit route · stop 3 of 4Ask your questionThe Library · Questions & answers
Take the whole Your first visit tour (4 stops)