Sidmool Dr. Troub Sebumzero Centella Powder
Everything behind the verdicts on this product: the rule that fired for each concern, the three answers and the documents they rest on, every study on the row with the date it was opened, and the versions of the tables that produced them. Nothing here is edited by hand; it is generated from the same records the verdicts are.
The scaleRecommendedGoodSupportingEarly evidenceNot for thisAvoidhow it works
Engine 5.2.0 · rules 0.5.1 · evidence table ev-2026.10-r231 · computed October 13, 2026 · how we decide · the evidence table · the anchors
No category-job specification exists for this category yet, so there is no job reading.
Listed for Excess Oiliness, Acne, Large Pores, Blackheads, with no verdict: the actives here have no evidence row for those concerns yet. That is a gap in our table, not a mark against the product.
- Excess Oiliness: The actives here (Silica, Zinc Oxide, 4 terpineol, Centella Asiatica) are in the research queue for excess oiliness; no verdict until their rows are written.
- Acne: The actives here (Silica, Zinc Oxide, 4 terpineol, Centella Asiatica) are in the research queue for acne; no verdict until their rows are written.
- Large Pores: The actives here (Silica, Zinc Oxide, 4 terpineol, Centella Asiatica) are in the research queue for large pores; no verdict until their rows are written.
- Blackheads: The actives here (Silica, Zinc Oxide, 4 terpineol, Centella Asiatica) are in the research queue for blackheads; no verdict until their rows are written.
A verdict is Dermington’s assessment of how well a product’s ingredients fit a concern — never a claim about what the product treats. Every rule is public and the same for every product; a brand cannot buy a reading. How we decide · what has changed · disclaimer.